
3D Advantage with Casio Exlim onboard
The an alternate means to twinning two
digital cameras for our digital stereo photography is to use a single camera
with a beam-splitter mounted. This approach ensures synchronisation and
with today’s high resolution digital cameras, splitting the image is not a
problem. Beam-splitters were commonplace in the 1950’s and can still be
found in the second-hand markets. The Tri-Delta configuration offers a
solution to most of the optical problems experienced with other
beam-splitter systems and for this reason, Larry Heyda chose it as the basis
for his 3D Advantage product.
The design of the 3D Advantage is well
thought out and assumes the posture of being the dominant part of the total
system. That is to say, the camera is mounted onto the beam-splitter rather
than the opposite. The optical path detour of the Tri-Delta configuration
requires the camera to be mounted horizontally with the lens axis
perpendicular to the norm. This being the case, the 3D Advantage has the
required appendages for a camera mounted in this way. An optical
right-angle finder views one half (left hand image) of the camera’s LCD
display. Mirrors have been included for the light sensor and built in
flash. Further details include adjustable mirrors providing a variable
stereo base. All of this has been styled into the cast resin housing which
includes two hand grips adding stability to the system in use. Folding
panels have the dual purpose of lens hood and protection for the surface
coated mirrors. A shoe is also provided for a slave flash unit.
My own 3D Advantage was built to take
the Casio Z 1200, a 12 mega pixel compact with a 4 x 3 aspect ratio. The
light path of the 3D Advantage is such that two images are captured base to
base, each having a 3 x 2 aspect ratio. This landscape format, similar to
that of a 35mm film camera, is an ideal format for View-Magic prints and
digital projection. The camera is secured via the tripod bush and is
readily removed for regular 2D use and battery changing etc; the optical
viewfinder is hinged to aid camera mounting and removal.

Rear view showing Viewfinder and Stereo Base adjustment.
In use, operation of the camera’s shutter release is within comfortable
reach and the viewfinder image from the well shielded LCD display is very
acceptable, even in bright conditions. Setting the stereo base is aided by
a calibrated scale around the mirror adjustment knob that also indicates the
near point for the set stereo base. In most circumstances the stereo base
setting may be left at around 2.5” (63mm) but the full range of 1.5” (37mm)
to 3.25” (82mm) allows optimal settings for close-ups, portraits and
landscapes. Unfortunately, the lens hood can be problematic cutting off
some of the image when the stereo base is set less than 2” (51mm) stereo
base, unless it is zoomed out of the field of view with the camera. The
lens hood can also masks the camera flash to some extent, leaving about 10%
at the lower edge of the image under exposed when shooting close-ups. I
have not found these faults to be a serious inhibition being apparent only
under extreme circumstances.
It is possible to use the 3x optical zoom facility of the Casio Z 1200 with
the 3D Advantage and with some experimentation, very acceptable near macro
photography can be achieved, well below the near point of 3’9” (1.2 metres)
optimum for a 1.5” (37mm) stereo base.
The images taken with the 3D advantage seen here have been aligned in
StereoPhoto Maker. This program has the ability to import Tri-Delta – base
to base (BB) stereo pairs and automatically align them before saving in your
preferred format. The amount of alignment correction required is minimal,
reflecting the accuracy to which the system has been manufactured.

The Powerhouse at
Manchester Science Museum

Autumn Patio Display
The 3D Advantage costs less than £500
and fitted with the Casio Z 1200, twelve mega-pixel camera, will compare
favourably with a professionally twinned pair of digital compact cameras.
Measuring around 150mm x 150mm x 200mm it is possibly more obtrusive than
the latter, but is very reliable and simple to use with less risk of
malfunctioning.
Barry Aldous – August
2008
For more information about
alternative camera options visit
www.freewebs.com/larryeda